Joel Selwood has made a profession. Jack Ginnivan is the brand new figurehead. The AFL should take a stand to guard gamers from themselves, writes Mark Robinson.
Footy has an issue and it simply isn’t Jack Ginnivan.
The issue is defending the pinnacle, and it might appear controversial, but it surely’s about defending gamers from themselves.
Collingwood’s Ginnivan is the poster youngster of the “drop” and a head-high hit, however he’s not alone.
It’s like that point when gamers drove into gamers’ heads over the ball – it wasn’t simply Byron Pickett’s downside both.
Since Pickett violently attacked Hawk Brendan Krummel in 1999 thus far, which is roughly 20 years into the concussion’s evolution, the AFL has taken main strides to guard the pinnacle.
In the meantime, headbutts have contributed to gamers killing themselves, gamers dropping their reminiscence, and gamers coping with psychological demons.
And now we stand on the daybreak of a possible epidemic, for as evening follows day, the youngsters of this land will comply with Ginnivan – and others – by bowing their heads to make contact.
The AFL can’t enable it to proceed.
At the moment, the AFL has tips for calling a play-on when there’s head contact after a participant “falls,” or when a participant geese, or when a participant plows ahead along with his head down, or when a participant plows his arm lifts.
Generally a free kick is awarded as a result of dropping, ducking and plowing is a participant’s prior alternative if he then fails to launch the ball.
In different circumstances, a ball is known as up.
Watch each AFL blockbuster match this weekend reside and non-commercially in-game on Kayo. New to Kayo? Begin your free trial now >
The AFL must take a stand.
From subsequent season, they should pay a free kick in opposition to any participant who makes use of their head and/or neck space to attract a free kick.
That is the one method gamers will be deterred from an motion that concussion specialists say contributes to mind trauma.
Make no mistake, youngsters will copy Ginnivan and that’s not what the AFL needs.
The league received’t say it publicly, however as custodians of the sport, they know they will’t enable that type of motion.
The legislator is chargeable for a safer office.
It’s not protected, it’s harmful.
Some observers say it’s good soccer, others say it’s good soccer, an try to use the foundations fairly than enjoying the ball and basically not conforming to the spirit of the sport.
The foundations are guidelines, say the mob, however the rule doesn’t work when we’ve got a sport the place a participant can use his head to take free kicks.
What are we ready for, one other Neil Sachse, earlier than we take it significantly?
The “drop” should now be stopped.
Cries that Joel Selwood compelled contact along with his head by elevating his arm for a decade and a half are legitimate, and AFL legend Dermott Brereton led these fees.
However let’s agree that concussion information and real-life tragedy have taken the dialogue from gentle frustration to real worry for gamers.
The AFL’s umpiring coverage is sweet, however as the sport evolves and gamers proceed to use the foundations, they should get higher.
Screw up the earlier alternative, in case you duck or “drop” it’s not play on, it’s a free kick in opposition to.
Gamers must be saved from themselves, and it’s simply not Jack Ginnivan.
Initially printed as Mark Robinson AFL should take a stand and pay a free kick in opposition to any participant who deliberately makes head-high contact
https://www.codesports.com.au/afl/mark-robinson-afl-must-make-a-stand-and-pay-a-free-kick-against-players-who-intentionally-draw-headhigh-contact/news-story/c1fb1db68236379dff9c850685acf3fe?nk=ec79af965de80548d2a8beff2273d86b-1657552087 Jack Ginnivan head excessive contact free kicks: AFL should pay free kicks in opposition to gamers who crouch or get on their knees, Joel Selwood, Mark Robinson